Category: Writing

January 31st, 2011

Outlining is Mandatory – Not Extra Credit

I am a total rule breaker, a rebel, Dottie, a loner. I cut in line when I don’t feel like I should have to wait (that’s the entitled New Yorker in me). I write my emails in all lower-case because I know, somewhere in writer heaven, William Strunk and E. B. White are sharing a drink and would approve of my minor rebellion. And I live in a special Eden reserved only for those who can stomach / thrive in the smoggy entertainment industry that is Los Angeles. Nothing about me is commonplace or pedestrian; everything about me is wild, edgy and unexpected… especially my writing.

I realized, after a heated debate during last night’s #scriptchat on twitter, some writers are flat out refusing to outline and I was shocked. I am no hobbyist. Writing is my profession, and as such, when I sell my work, people expect my scripts to not only be correct, ground-breaking, and unexcelled, it also has to be worth paying for. So, how do I make sure that I not only deliver a solid product that is exactly what the story editor / producer / client wants and still get to run free through the fields of creativity?  I OUTLINE EVERYTHING!

Don’t get me wrong. Outlining sucks. I hate doing what feels like extra work for free. HATE! Outlining is boring and hard and annoying and not as fun as running through the fields of creativity untethered to such banalities as a plan. Who needs a plan when it feels so good just to write? Well, writing for pay, or any writing really is not about the masturbatory feeling of creation. If you’re lucky, sometimes you get a happy ending and that’s awesome, but that’s not usually the end goal. It’s about getting the work done correctly and excellently. And the way to ensure that happens is to outline.

I can hear all of you non-outlining writers and your myriad of excuses like a Greek Chorus: it “hinders my creativity,” “forces me into a box,” “doesn’t allow me to find new angles with my story…” Yeah, I totally get it. But without an outline, the fields of creativity turn into a hall of mirrors and you will get lost in the reflection of what your story was supposed to be, not what it actually is. It is the very rare writer who is able to wing it and churn out a salable product at the end. So, basically, not you. Not me. Not 99% of working or aspiring writers. We all must outline, so we have a basic road map of the story we’re trying to communicate or your story will literally get lost in translation.

Outlining does not, in fact, hinder anything. It in no way hampers your ability to fantasize and create inventive scenarios for your characters to live out. It forces you to do all that awesome “thinking-it-through” before you ever hit page 1. It’s a twisted version of instant gratification. Outlining affords you the chance to play with your characters without spending tedious hours churning out pages that suck and eventually get deleted. In reality, outlining will help you and your story stay focused, and if you follow a few of my tips, you’ll discover that you’re in fact freer to do all the fun writing because your foundation is solid.

There’s a few ways / steps to tackle outlining:

I generally will have the client start by writing a simple beat sheet. Just a basic shopping list of story beats: this happens, then this happens, and then that happens, etc. It’s never more than a page, but it helps them see what their story really is, the important beats, the basic ideas and characters and helps them discover plot holes, lacking character arcs, and story misfires. The simple act of “thinking-it-through” always helps the writers see what is working and what still needs work.

Then, once we’ve gone over the 1-page and talked through the story they want to tell, versus what I’ve read, and they’re at a place where I feel like their barest skeleton is solid, I ask them to expand that simple 1-page into 5. It’s then, they can add more flourish, but not too much… this is an outline, not a short story, some important or funny snippets of dialogue they don’t want to forget, and flesh out the story a bit more.

After we review that, see how it’s working, discuss tweaks if necessary, I send them back to expand their 5-page outline further to 30-ish pages. I say “ish” because this isn’t an exact science. Some writers who are honed and in practice can deliver a solid feature outline in 20-pages, some are gabbier and need 40-pages. But 30-pages is a good number to shoot for. In this pass, I ask the writer to really tell the whole story (without florid language), scene by scene. 30-pages is enough to develop your characters’ emotional pathos, embellish your sub-plots, and still allow for dialogue quips, etc.

Then (and here’s my trick) what I do, and what I instruct my clients to do, is take that solid 30-page outline, and pop it into the script. Since you’ve been so painstaking in setting forth your story, you can use your outline as the basis of your first draft, building out your script from there. It always seems to the clients “God! Why is she such a sadist?!” until they realize, that they never have to stare at a blank screen. You’ve immediately got 30-pages of your script done, just by popping in the outline. It removes the pressure of facing that white page, with only FADE IN:. It’s a cheap trick, but it’s a good one. By then, you’ve already got a leg up on expanding your 30-pages into 90 or 120, but no more, because my bladder can’t take anymore 3-hour movies.

When you write from within the outline, you know which scene is next, where to plant the misdirection and how to heighten the tension, because you’ve already planned for it. But let’s say, now you’re into draft 1 and you think, “Eh, this isn’t working.” You’ve at least got your 1-page list of scenes, your 5-page outline and your notes to reference, which makes plot changes way easier to implement and keep track of, especially if it’s a major shift. You need to remember all the stuff that builds around it, and fix whatever is impacted by it. How are you supposed to keep track of all those balls in the air, if you forget one? Outlining will help keep your writing on the ball.

Writing without an outline can be fun and dangerous, but rarely yields successful results. Why not expend that same level of effort and enthusiasm by furiously typing in a constructive manner? Then, you will be free to run through the fields of creativity untethered by banalities… you’ll be able to have your script and write it too.

Photo courtesy of regrifters.com / Photo Credit – Jon Shaivitz

January 25th, 2011

It is an honor, just to be nominated… for a Shorty Award!

As we all sit back and bask in the excitement of The Oscar season to come (now that the nods have come down today), I get to bask in the excitement of being nominated myself… for a Shorty Award! And it truly is a thrill just to be nominated. But now that I’m in it, like everything else I’ve ever done, I want to win.

The Shorty Awards honors the best producers of real-time, short-form content (under 140 characters) and I can’t believe that I’ve been included with some of the best tweeters out there, Nathan Fillion, Maureen Johnson and the great NPH. I’ve been nominated in #screenwriting, #scriptwriter and several other categories, and while I’m winning the #screenwriting war, I’m losing the big #entertainment battle. I need your help to sweep the #entertainment category with over 1300 votes. I currently have 2. Here’s the low-down on voting.

How the Shorty Awards Work

The Shorty Awards are a worldwide effort to engage hundreds of thousands of Twitter users to identify the best people and organizations on Twitter.

Voting

  • To vote, send a tweet like this: I nominate @TwitterUser for a Shorty Award in #category because… (add reason here)
  • You can also tweet shorter votes like this: #shortyawards @username #category (add quick reason here). This shorter format is helpful if you want to vote from a party, on the road, in a meeting, or on a boat
  • Be as creative as you want with the reason
  • A tweet that does not give a reason for the nomination will not be counted
  • The nomination must be relevant to the category
  • Only one person and one category per tweet
  • Voting for the same person in the same category more than once just replaces the text of your original vote; it does not count as an additional vote
  • You can vote in any of the Official Categories (#entertainment for me) or make up a category of your own. If a new category becomes popular, it might be turned into an Official Category with an award presented at the ceremony in March
  • Twitterers are welcome to campaign and encourage their friends to vote for them
  • Voters must be active Twitter users prior to the start of the competition. Votes originating from new Twitter accounts or accounts used mainly for Shorty Awards voting will automatically be disqualified and will not count toward the rankings

Winner Selection

Nominations

  • Anyone with a valid, active, and public Twitter account can nominate any Twitter user for a Shorty Award in any category
  • The six users with the highest rank in each official category at the end of the nomination period become finalists
  • In case of a tie, all of the nominees who tied will be included as finalist.
  • Nominations run through the end of January 2011!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! THAT’S SOON! So, please, like I’m a telethon, please vote for me in the #entertainment category and ask your friends to do likewise. It’ll take a second and will mean so much to me.

x

xox

January 20th, 2011

Rom Zom Com Special – Free Query with Coverage

As Valentine’s Day draws near, hopefully your mailboxes are filled with sweet cards, your hearts are filled with glowing love and may the chocolate from the shiny red box not end up on your ass. My fingers are crossed for all three for me!!!

But chocolate and valentines are not nearly as important as your romantic comedy script. Is it merely in need of a new outfit and a bikini wax for that first date? Or is it so rusty, from being benched in a drawer that it needs a whole new shine before getting back out on the town? Either way, we’re here to help!

So, between now and the end of February, Covermyscript.com is offering a SPECIAL: book coverage on any ROMANTIC COMEDY / DRAMEDY (or ZOMBIE / HORROR flick if you’re just anti the whole “love” thing) and you’ll get a FREE QUERY letter as our valentine to you. That’s a $65 gift… something that should hopefully warm your cockles… and help your success.

I’m so excited to get all, hot, bothered and in-the-mood reading all of your steamy romantic movies. February is going to be a very special month, indeed!

January 7th, 2011

Why your film education starts on TV with Rod Serling

I had a funny experience recently and I thought I’d share. A client Skyped (add me, I’m CoverMyScript.com) to do a consultation, wanting to run their idea past me before they launched into the great beyond of outlining, to see if I felt like their idea had merit. So I listened to his pitch, and it was indeed a terrific idea for a terrific movie; Harold and Maude. I told the client, you and Hal Ashby sure do have something there.

The client was puzzled, who was this Hal Ashby? Was he another client or a Hollywood writer? I was like, duh?! Harold and Maude?

“Hello?!” I said. “This movie has been made already and perfectly. So unless you own the rights and are doing a remake, you just pitched me a 40-year old movie.” The client couldn’t believe how he had never heard of it, because it did indeed sound awesome to him and immediately went to watch it on Netflix.

So, he books me again, two more ideas. This time he pitches me the “Invaders” and “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street” episodes of The Twilight Zone, with no changes or differences. I would swear that it was plagiarism, had he not been so appalled when I told him, that he, like M. Knight Shalamalanadingdong had ripped off The Twilight Zone. I rolled my eyes so big, I’m sure they caused an earthquake somewhere.

This is now three times this guy has pitched to me, and three times they were ideas that had already been done and done brilliantly. He had refused any black and white movies or television because they were in black and white and therefore must be boring. I was alarmed and immediately set him straight. Everything comes from something and most everything comes from The Twilight Zone. I don’t mean literally, I mean the television program.

But his pop culture education was so woefully lacking, not only had he never seen an episode, he was unable to realize he was accidentally stealing the best produced ideas out there. I told him, when he crumbled under the annoyance of having to think up more produced stories to pitch to me that he should just watch The Twilight Zone and see all the stories that have ever been written. Because in their 5 seasons, they had maybe 6 bad episodes among 156, and almost every one of their stories was an original gem that many others have, in one way or another, ripped off. Better to know what’s been done, so you’re not treading over hallowed ground thinking you’re a genius. Or at least that’s what I told him.

For those of you unindoctrinated to the genius work of Rod Serling, he wrote the bulk of the episodes for The Twilight Zone, a series of his creation that ran from 1959-1964, after coming off a successful career as a movie-of-the-week writer for TV series like “Playhouse 90″, “Westinghouse Desilu Playhouse, and “Armchair Theatre”. Seriously, check him out. Read his work. Soak it up. He was one of the most prolific television writers ever. In fact, his episode “Requiem for a Heavyweight” is considered by most to be better than any boxing movie ever, including Raging Bull and On The Waterfront.

Find the script, read it. It’s fantastic. And it holds up incredibly well for a 50-year old script. Actually, it’s got a lot of similar themes to the current true story “The Fighter,” starring Mark Wahlburg and Christian Bale.

I’m not going to launch into a diatribe and chronicle Rod Serling’s whole career, because there are hundreds of books, articles and interviews on him everywhere. Go seek out his writing or if you’re too lazy to read, add The Twilight Zone to your Netflix queue. It’s worth it to watch the best serialized television ever created… even if it’s in “boring black and white.” Had we not been skyping, I would’ve smacked him with a copy of Metropolis. Fool.

December 8th, 2010

The Social Network patois and why it’s so annoying :,-(

The Social Network patois is annoying! Which part? The part where they…talk too much and say so much and so fast and it’s all so precious. My head hurts from The Social Network, Aaron Sorkin‘s 2-hour amped, surprisingly deposition laden romp about people writing code and backstabbing over fraternities that are really study clubs, chicken abuse and big bucks.

I listened to the opening scene: a break-up we’ve all had, a scene we’ve all written. A generic college bar, a guy and girl who can’t get it together. Harsh words exchanged at such a fast rate that it felt less like real life and more like the characters were waiting smugly with their barbs just to step on each other’s words. They weren’t talking like people, or characters really, they were using the writer’s own voice. And when everyone sounds the same, it’s a lot of shouting down a boring crowded hallway of clones.

Opening your characters to new voices while keeping them in stead with their peers is the way to properly craft a character. Besties will have common phrases, while so will criminals, generally not the same ones, but each person and the way they speak is unique and special and to just steamroll from one line to the next isn’t right, because it doesn’t give the actors a chance to emote, to relate, or to create the necessary pathos needed to care about the characters. Or to borrow a phrase from Tyler Durden, Sorkin is just letting his characters “Wait for their turn to speak.” He doesn’t give them the space to deeply interact. It’s like a boxing a hanging bag: boom boom boom boom. Rhythmic repetition but a slamming beat over and over.

Those characters weren’t connecting, they were reciting lines like every Sorkin character ever recited a line before them, well, but sounding like Sorkin himself, hyper, clever and geniusly aggressive. And maybe, if I play devil’s advocate for a second and give Sorkin some credit, and say he was setting up the pacing, the energy of the film, the characters as unlikable people through this opening scene, well he did that in spades. Except nothing about any of it endeared me to any of them. Because they were so go-go-go in the exact same way, my heart was thumping, due to the non-stop, rapid-fire, pseudo-genius-ease. I found the dialogue exhausting. I walked out and wished for aspirin for my aching head.

This whole movie felt like each character was hanging around the craft service table just waiting for their chance to deliver their lines perfectly. I LOVE David Fincher. He’s a God and his filmmaking is incredible. It was exciting, off-putting, confusing and while I felt the ending lacked some of the resolution I was looking for, I felt it was artful and worthy. It was beautifully shot, the pacing was excellent and the match reveals worked brilliantly.

However, the writing drove me mad! I tried to get lost in Fincher’s cinema, but I can’t help it. I can’t stand Aaron Sorkin’s “coke binge patois”… every character sounds like the same genius who has been up all night doing blow. And while that’s fun for some, it gives me a headache, especially when no one has their spoons out willing to share.

To be fair, Sorkin isn’t the only one whose writing I find challenging for this exact reason. Sitting through aggressive, same patios is exhausting, not because the writers themselves are not super-genius talented; they’re characters, every one of them, are a one-trick ponies and I want more.

The common thread here is that when every character in your script sounds the same: the grocery man, the teen slut, the butcher, the baker, and the gun runner, your script won’t read right. The best writers are writers who are able to have a total consistent voice that is their own, while imbuing their characters with their own voices and patois. For example, I might speak differently with my bestie at a rave than at a holiday dinner with the folks, but if my folks and everyone at the party sounds the same, and everyone in every scene after does as well, it looses its charm. But in movies like this, with very important writers, the WRITING IS WHAT MATTERS. Don’t make everyone sound the same. Give the characters the respect they deserve to be their own people. You put so much effort into creating them, make them the special individuals they are.

Yes, the story is important, but one part of the screenwriting process that is so neglected are the characters’ voices, and if you’re unable to craft them so that they’re different enough to live in the same world but “be their own people,” then for me your movie isn’t a success. I’m not lambasting Sorkin. He’s a genius and talented and he and I know it. I just wish he didn’t write all of his characters the same and at the same level of clever genius, studio exec or janitor. It makes them all seem dumb in their shining brilliance.

Oh and a little shoutout to Justin Timberlake trying to act. He’s so cute. I wanted to pinch his cheeks every time he earnestly tried to deliver a poignant line. Aww, Justin. Keep at it buddy, you’ll get there. I hear you’re the voice of Boo-Boo.